Home  ›  Critical Review of Craig and Tseng Gastric Bypass

Critical Review of Craig and Tseng Gastric Bypass

Written By Saturday 16 April 2022 Add Comment Edit

Abstract

Purpose

Obesity is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Weight loss due to gastric bypass (GBP) surgery improves clinical outcomes and may be a cost-effective intervention. To estimate the cost-effectiveness of GBP compared to clinical treatment in severely obese individuals with and without diabetes in the perspective of the Brazilian public health arrangement.

Materials and Methods

A Markov model was developed to compare costs and outcomes of gastric bypass in an open approach to clinical handling. Health states were living with diabetes, remission of diabetes, non-fatal and fatal myocardial infarction, and death. Nosotros too included the occurrence of complications related to surgery and plastic surgery after the gastric bypass surgery. The direct costs were obtained from primary data collection performed in three public reference centers for obesity treatment. Utility values too derived from this cohort, while transition probabilities came from the international literature. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate uncertainties. The model considered a 10-twelvemonth time horizon and a 5% discount rate.

Results

Over 10 years, GBP increased quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and costs compared to clinical treatment, resulting in an incremental toll-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of Int$1820.17/QALY and Int$1937.73/QALY in individuals with and without diabetes, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that utility values and direct costs of treatments were the parameters that affected the nigh the ICERs.

Conclusion

The report demonstrated that GBP is a cost-constructive intervention for severely obese individuals in the Brazilian public health system perspective, with a meliorate result in individuals with diabetes.

References

  1. Zhou B, Lu Y, Hajifathalian G, Bentham J, Di Cesare M et al. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration.; 2016;387:1513–xxx. Available from: https://doi.org/x.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8

    Article  Google Scholar

  2. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Vigitel Brasil 2016: vigilância de fatores de risco east proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico. Ministério da Saúde, Secr. Vigilância em Saúde, Dep. Vigilância Doenças e Agravos não Transm. e Promoção da Saúde. 2017. Available from: www.saude.gov.br/svs

  3. Tremmel K, Gerdtham U-One thousand, Nilsson P, Saha S. Economic burden of obesity: a systematic literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 [cited 2018 Dec fifteen];fourteen:435. Bachelor from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28422077

    Article  Google Scholar

  4. Bahia L, Coutinho ES, Barufaldi LA, Abreu Gde A, Malhao TA, de Souza CP, et al. The costs of overweight and obesity-related diseases in the Brazilian public health system: cross-exclusive study. BMC Public Health. 2012/06/21. Rio de Janeiro; 2012;12:440. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-440

  5. Governo practise Brasil. Aumenta número de cirurgias bariátricas realizadas pelo SUS. Governo do Brasil; 2017. Bachelor from: http://www.brasil.gov.br/saude/2014/03/aumenta-numero-de-cirurgias-bariatricas-realizadas-pelo-sus

  6. Ferrari MA. Colelitíase em pacientes bariátricos: correlação da perda de peso com a incidência de colelitíase em pacientes após a realização do by-pass gastrintestinal. Clínica Cirúrgica. [Porto Alegre]: Pontifícia Universidade Católica practise Rio Grande do Sul; 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.cyberspace/10923/6812

  7. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano Chiliad, Buchwald H, Scopinaro North. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015/04/04. General and Endoscopic Surgery Unit, S. Giovanni Bosco Infirmary, Via Filippo Maria Briganti, 255, Naples, Italy, luigiangrisani@chirurgiaobesita.information technology.; 2015;25:1822–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  8. Sjostrom 50, Lindroos AK, Peltonen Grand, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years later on bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004/12/24. Section of Body Composition and Metabolism, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.; 2004;351:2683–93. Available from: https://doi.org/x.1056/NEJMoa035622

    Article  Google Scholar

  9. Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. Due north Engl J Med. 2007/08/24. Gothenburg, Swedend; 2007;357:741–52. Available from: https://doi.org/x.1056/NEJMoa066254

    Article  Google Scholar

  10. Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, Gospodarevskaya Eastward, Loveman E, Baxter L, et al. The clinical effectiveness and price-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economical evaluation. Heal Technol Appraise 2009/09/04. Southampton Health Engineering science Assessments Center, Academy of Southampton, Uk.; 2009;xiii:ane–190, 215–357, 3–4. Bachelor from: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta13410, 2009

  11. Sjostrom 50, Peltonen G, Jacobson P, Sjostrom CD, Karason Grand, Wedel H, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. Jama. 2012/01/05. Gothenburg, Swedend; 2012;307:56–65. Available from: https://doi.org/x.1001/jama.2011.1914

    Article  Google Scholar

  12. Romeo Southward, Maglio C, Burza MA, Pirazzi C, Sjoholm Yard, Jacobson P, et al. Cardiovascular events after bariatric surgery in obese subjects with type ii diabetes. Diabetes Intendance. 2012/08/03. Gothenburg, Swedend; 2012;35:2613–7. Bachelor from: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0193

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  13. Sjostrom L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, Ahlin Due south, Andersson-Assarsson J, Anveden A, et al. Clan of bariatric surgery with long-term remission of blazon two diabetes and with microvascular and macrovascular complications. Jama. 2014/06/11. Gothenburg, Swedend; 2014;311:2297–304. Available from: https://doi.org/x.1001/jama.2014.5988

    Article  Google Scholar

  14. Eliasson B, Liakopoulos 5, Franzen S, Naslund I, Svensson AM, Ottosson J, et al. Cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery in Sweden: a nationwide, matched, observational accomplice study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015/x/03. Gothenburg, Swedend; 2015;3:847–54. Available from: https://doi.org/x.1016/s2213-8587(15)00334-4

    Article  Google Scholar

  15. Kelles SMB, Diniz MF, Machado CJ, Barreto SM. Mortality rate subsequently open Roux-in-Y gastric bypass: a x-yr follow-upwards. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2014/06/12. Centro de Pos Graduacao, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.; 2014;47:617–25.

  16. Kelles SMB, Machado CJ, Barreto SM. Ten-years of bariatric surgery in Brazil: in-hospital mortality rates for patients assisted by universal health system or a health maintenance organization. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27:261–7. Available from: https://doi.org/ten.1590/s0102-67202014000400008

    Article  Google Scholar

  17. Faria GR, Preto JR, Costa-Maia J. Gastric bypass is a cost-saving procedure: results from a comprehensive Markov model. Obes Surg. 2013 [cited 2019 Mar iv];23:460–half dozen. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23341033

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  18. Borisenko O, Lukyanov 5, Johnsen SP, Funch-Jensen P. Cost analysis of bariatric surgery in Denmark made with a determination-analytic model. Dan Med J. 2017/09/05. funchjensen@gmail.com.; 2017;64.

  19. Lucchese M, Borisenko O, Mantovani LG, Cortesi PA, Cesana Thou, Adam D, et al. Cost-utility analysis of bariatric surgery in Italia: results of decision-analytic modelling. Obes Facts. 2017/06/12. Bariatric, General Surgery and Metabolic Department, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Florence, Italia.; 2017;10:261–72. Bachelor from: https://doi.org/10.1159/000475842

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  20. Hoerger TJ, Zhang P, Segel JE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for severely obese adults with diabetes. Diabetes care. North Carolina. 2010;33:1933–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-0554

    Article  Google Scholar

  21. Keating C, Neovius M, Sjöholm K, Peltonen M, Narbro G, Eriksson JK, et al. Healthcare costs during fifteen years later on bariatric surgery for patients with different baseline glucose condition. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Melbourne, Australia; 2015;iii:855–65. Available from: https://doi.org/ten.1016/s2213-8587(fifteen)00290-9

    Article  Google Scholar

  22. Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, Schauer PR, Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ, et al. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by international diabetes organizations. Diabetes Care. 2016/05/26. London, U.K.; 2016;39:861–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0236

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  23. Clan Ad. Obesity management for the treatment of blazon two diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2017/12/10. 2018;41:S65-s72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-S007

  24. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Ciência e, Tecnologia. Diretrizes metodológicas - diretriz de avaliação econômica. Bras. Secr. Ciência, Tecnol. e Insumos Estratégicos. 2015.

  25. Caro JJ, Briggs AH, Siebert U, Kuntz KM. Modeling good inquiry practices--overview: a written report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Practiced Inquiry Practices Task Force-ane. Med Decis Mak. 2012/09/20. Montreal, Canada; 2012;32:667–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x12454577

    Article  Google Scholar

  26. Siebert U, Alagoz O, Bayoumi AM, Jahn B, Owens DK, Cohen DJ, et al. State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Inquiry Practices Task Force--3. Value Heal. 2012/09/25. Tirol, Austria.; 2012;15:812–20. Bachelor from: https://doi.org/x.1016/j.jval.2012.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar

  27. Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Wellness Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Heal. 2013/03/30. Edmonton, Canada; 2013;16:231–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar

  28. Associação Brasileira para o Estudo da Obesidade due east da Síndrome Metabólica. Diretrizes brasileiras de obesidade 2016. 2016.

  29. Zubiaurre PR, Bahia LR, da Rosa MQM, Assumpção RP, Padoin AV, Sussembach SP, et al. Estimated costs of clinical and surgical treatment of severe obesity in the Brazilian Public Health Arrangement. Obes Surg. 2017 [cited 2019 Feb xviii];27:3273–fourscore. Bachelor from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28717859

  30. Santos Yard, Cintra MACT, Monteiro AL, Santos B, Gusmão-filho F, Andrade MV, Noronha 1000, Cruz LN, Camey S, Tura B, Kind P Brazilian valuation of EQ-5D-3L health states. Med Decis Mak. 2016 [cited 2018 Nov 15];36:253–263. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26492896

    Article  Google Scholar

  31. Ministério da Saúde. Gabinete practise Ministro. Portaria no 424, de nineteen de março de 2013. Redefine as diretrizes para a organização da prevenção e do tratamento do sobrepeso e obesidade como linha de cuidado prioritária da Rede de Atenção à Saúde das Pessoas com Doenças Crônicas. Brasília; 2013.

  32. Earth Depository financial institution. PPP conversion gene, LCU per international $. 2017. Available from: https://information.worldbank.org/indicator/PA.NUS.PPP

  33. Grossi J. Post-operative complications of open gastric by-laissez passer Roux-Y: consecutive incisional hernia repair - the sublay technique. 21st World Congr. Int. Fed. Surg. Obes. Metab. Disord. Rio de Janeiro/Brazil: Springer US; p. 459–lx.

  34. Portal da Saúde. Informações de Saúde (TABNET). Assistência à Saúde. Produção Hospitalar (SIH/SUS). Bachelor from: http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/alphabetize.php?expanse=0202

  35. Ministério da Saúde. System of management of the table of procedures, medications and OPM from SUS. Available from: http://sigtap.datasus.gov.br/tabela-unificada/app/sec/inicio.jsp

  36. Bahia LR, Rosa RS, Santos RD, Araujo D V. Estimated costs of hospitalization due to coronary artery disease attributable to familial hypercholesterolemia in the Brazilian public health system. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018/05/24. Rio de Janeiro; 2018; Available from: https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000030

  37. Schwarzer R, Rochau U, Saverno Chiliad, Jahn B, Bornschein B, Muehlberger Due north, et al. Systematic overview of cost-effectiveness thresholds in x countries beyond four continents. J Comp Eff Res. 2015/10/23. 2015;four:485–504. Bachelor from: https://doi.org/ten.2217/cer.15.38

    Article  Google Scholar

  38. World Health Organization (WHO). Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development. Report of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health: Executive Summary. Geneva: World Health Arrangement; 2001. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42709

    Google Scholar

  39. Craig BM, Tseng DS. Cost-effectiveness of gastric bypass for severe obesity. Am J Med. 2002/eleven/thirteen. Wisconsin, USA.; 2002;113:491–viii.

    Article  Google Scholar

  40. Ackroyd R, Mouiel J, Chevallier JM, Daoud F. Price-effectiveness and budget touch on of obesity surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes in three European countries. Obes Surg. 2006/11/30. Southward Yorkshire, Great britain.; 2006;xvi:1488–503. Bachelor from: https://doi.org/x.1381/096089206778870067

    Article  Google Scholar

  41. Maklin S, Malmivaara A, Linna M, Victorzon M, Koivukangas V, Sintonen H. Toll-utility of bariatric surgery for morbid obesity in Finland. Br J Surg. 2011/09/03. Helsinki, Finland.; 2011;98:1422–9. Available from: https://doi.org/x.1002/bjs.7640

    Article  Google Scholar

  42. Borisenko O, Mann O, Duprée A. Cost-utility assay of bariatric surgery compared with conventional medical management in Frg: a decision analytic modeling. BMC Surg. Hamburg, Frg; 2017;17. Bachelor from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0284-0

  43. Alsumali A, Al-Hawag A, Samnaliev M, Eguale T. Systematic assessment of decision analytic models for the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018/05/08. Boston, Massachusetts; 2018; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar

  44. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria GM/MS no 252, de xxx de março de 1999. Inclui o procedimento de gastroplastia na Tabela do Sistema de Informações Hospitalares practice Sistema Único de Saúde – SIH/SUS e credencia hospitais para realizá-lo. Brasília; 1999. Bachelor from: http://portal2.saude.gov.br/saudelegis/leg_norma_espelho_consulta.cfm?id=3558576&highlight=&tipoBusca=post&slcOrigem=0&slcFonte=0&sqlcTipoNorma=27&hdTipoNorma=27&buscaForm=post&bkp=pesqnorma&fonte=0&origem=0&sit=0&assunto=&qtd=10&tipo_norma=27&numero=252&

  45. Ministério da Saúde. Gabinete do Ministro. Portaria no 482, de 06 de março de 2017. Inclui o procedimento Cirurgia Bariátrica por Videolaparoscopia na Tabela de Procedimentos, Medicamentos, Órteses, Próteses eastward Materiais Especiais exercise Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS. Secretaria de Atenção a Saúde, editor. Brasília; 2017. Bachelor from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/sas/2017/prt0482_07_03_2017.html

  46. PAHO FAO and. Panorama of Food and Nutrition Security in Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago de Chile; 2017. Bachelor from: http://world wide web.fao.org/three/a-i7914e.pdf

  47. Doumouras AG, Saleh F, Anvari S, Gmora S, Anvari Yard, Hong D. Mastery in bariatric surgery: the long-term surgeon learning bend of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2017/02/24. Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.Division of General Surgery, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.; 2018;267:489–94. Available from: https://doi.org/x.1097/sla.0000000000002180

    Article  Google Scholar

  48. Ministério da Saúde. Gabinete exercise Ministro. Portaria due northo 425, de 19 de Março de 2013. Estabelece regulamento técnico, normas eastward critérios para a Assistência de Alta Complexidade ao Indivíduo com Obesidade. Gabinete practise Ministro, editor. Brasília; 2013. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2013/prt0425_19_03_2013.html

  49. El-Kadre 50, Tinoco Ac, Tinoco RC, Aguiar Fifty, Santos T. Overcoming the learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 12-year experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013/03/nineteen. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2013;9:867–72. Available from: https://doi.org/ten.1016/j.soard.2013.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar

  50. Soarez PC, Novaes HMD. Cost-effectiveness thresholds and the Brazilian Unified National Health System. Cad Saúde Pública, vol. 33; 2017. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2017000400301&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

    Google Scholar

  51. Bertram MY, Lauer JA, De Joncheere Yard, Edejer T, Hutubessy R, Kieny MP, et al. Cost–effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons. Bull World Heal Organ. Geneva; 2016;94:925–930. Bachelor from: https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.15.164418

    Article  Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the support of the Brazilian Establish of Health Technology (IATS)/National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). We thank Prof. Luiz Guilherme Kraemer de Aguiar (PhD) and Prof. Walmir Ferreira Coutinho (PhD) for the permission to collect data with patients from their obesity treatment centers.

Funding

The National Quango for Scientific and Technological Evolution (CNPq), process no. 457440/2013-nine, funded this study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Land University of Rio de Janeiro, Boulevard 28 de Setembro, 77, 3° andar, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20551-030, Brazil

    Roberto Pereira Assumpção, Luciana Ribeiro Bahia, Michelle Quarti Machado da Rosa & Denizar Araujo Vianna

  2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Department, National Found of Cardiology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Marcelo Goulart Correia

  3. Section of Public Wellness, Academy of Brasilia,, Centro Metropolitano, conjunto A, lote 01, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 72.220-275, Brazil

    Everton Nunes da Silva

  4. Center of Morbid Obesity, São Lucas Hospital, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Ipiranga 6690/302, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande practise Sul, 90610-000, Brazil

    Paula Rosales Zubiaurre & Claudio Corá Mottin

Contributions

LRB, DVA, and ENS conceived and designed the study; PRZ, MQR, and RPA performed the data collection and preliminary analysis; MGC adult the model and performed the statistical analysis; and LRB, RPA, and MQR wrote the draft manuscript. All authors revised and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Pereira Assumpção.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

RPA received regime grants to comport out the study. Authors RPA, LRB, DAV, MQR, RPA, ENS, PRZ, and CCM declare that they do not have whatever conflicts of interest. The study received funds for information monitoring and statistical analysis. The funder had no part in study design, information drove and assay, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Research Ethics Committees of each establishment approved this study and approved on the Brazil Platform for clinical trials with their related numbers: HSL/PUCRS (1.488.130), IEDE (855.012), and UERJ (731.209).

Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher'southward Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Assumpção, R.P., Bahia, 50.R., da Rosa, G.Q.G. et al. Cost-Utility of Gastric Bypass Surgery Compared to Clinical Handling for Severely Obese With and Without Diabetes in the Perspective of the Brazilian Public Health Organisation. OBES SURG 29, 3202–3211 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03957-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Appointment:

  • DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03957-seven

Keywords

  • Cost-utility
  • Obesity
  • Gastric featherbed surgery

riosyoughbou.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-019-03957-7

0 Response to "Critical Review of Craig and Tseng Gastric Bypass"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel